fees from all pools, reinstate something like the 100 day (or shorter) protection requirement to let fees and IL loss insurance accumulate and go from there? The protocol is more efficient that any other DEX and they are capturing real fees paid by real people. Surely the difference in efficiency can be at least partially captured and used by the protocol to stabilize.
A few % ILP yeah. But we are in the 40-50% range. That's too much. On a 1000erh that a 500k payout. That's about 1mn bnt at today's price.
What pool is that? My pool has almost no loss, less than 1%
Wow. Link is at 50% and eth at 43%
https://twitter.com/linksemper/status/1538957697973997568?s=21&t=CjvP5Pj1DMr4zcngcGv-CQ IL is not shared at all? This dude really got 100% Link back?
How did he get IL protection when he withdrew after IL was disabled.
Wild guess: there wasn’t IL or it was really small. My current IL is about 1-2 % so it can go to slippage.
So I have a chance of it not to lose 50% eth/link???
There was IL if u look at the etherscan transaction. He got paid a large percentage in BNT. But how did he even get IL protection when it was disabled by the time he withdrew?
50 % IL would require that other token drops -97 % in relation to the other token.
Just looked into this. He did not receive any BNT
Yeah looks like the BNT went to another address, likely a Bancor address.
Обсуждают сегодня