209 похожих чатов

Didn’t we need a governance proposal for such a split?

This is really new or did I miss something?

6 ответов

25 просмотров

I think governance proposal are for grants, spending the community spend pool, etc. These tokens are some of the vested tokens, ecosystem tokens, etc so the foundation just moved them from Ethereum to Injective Chain and staked them

Bojan Angjelkoski
I think governance proposal are for grants, spendi...

And staked them. Any chance you can disclose who runs this foundation?

Wilco- Автор вопроса
Bojan Angjelkoski
I think governance proposal are for grants, spendi...

It’s part of the protocol and a major change to many of us. Nobody knows who is behind the foundation even you can’t answer who it is at this point. These things really need a proper upfront explanation and might even need a governance proposal imho we want to be decentralized

Wilco
It’s part of the protocol and a major change to ma...

The foundation is based on panama, its name is OpenDeFi foundation and is run by board members. They will have a website soon that provides more information. This is not news in crypto guys, almost every major protocol does the same.

Wilco
It’s part of the protocol and a major change to ma...

also, this has been the case since the beginning, this is not a major change that happened right now, we've been saying that InjectiveLabs is one of the core contributors to the Injective Protocol for as long as I can remember

Entity
And staked them. Any chance you can disclose who r...

This is weird. since 2020 when there was nothing developed, there are always the same people. The same people who developed and launched protocol. And then developed inj pro, hub, Explorer, etc.... You can also see commits on GitHub related to chain upgrade which are developed also from Bojan and other....so having entity in Panama is just for legal and tax reasons. At the end of the day this are same people. Eric, Albert, Bojan, ....

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта