210 похожих чатов

Hi bro, I am Lunc holders and have some experience in

trading.

I understand the frustration of the community.

Let me put myself in the shoe of as a CEO of binance, traders and holders.

For example:

As a CEO of an exchanges, I earn a lot from trading fees.

And trading fee in binance is about between 0.02% to 0.1% per trade. (The higher the tier the lower the fees).

If I were to suddenly increase the trading fee from 0.1% to 1.2%.

Now, my traders would need to pay 10 times from fees alone.

Would the trader still trade at a fee like that?

Most of the time, the market is moving sideways, after trending upwards or downwards.

So most of the traders are actually scalpers which aims for profit of maybe 0.2% to 1% on a ranging market.

And Binance would probably have their own traders who trade manually or on a robot.

Although in crypto trading 95% will lose money in trading.

100% of them still need to pay trading fee, no matter what is the outcome.

If most traders aim for average 1% profit per trade,

They will definitely go another trading pairs with the lower fees.

Then volume will drop drastically.

However, these scalpers can have anywhere between 20-100 trades per day.

Let say, we reduce the burn tax to say about 0.02% per trade, since the actual trading fee is between (0.02%- 0.1%).

It is still within the traders capability to pay the trading fee.

So, if the scalpers open 20-100 trades per day.

20 trades x 0.02%= 0.4%
100 trades x 0.02% = 2%

We will get about average 1.2% burn tax per day which is awesome.

Of course as a holder, we want CZ to implement those tax to reduce our supply rapidly.

So my take is, we have to make it into a win-win situation.

Maybe for on chain tax of 1.2% is fine.

But for spot trading even a tax of 0.02% can have huge impact due to the high number of trades executed.

Yes, it seems scheming to impose the 3 steps for the voting and 50% volume trade and so on.

I think the underlying message that CZ wants to tell us is to let us have a taste of being a trader.

And put ourselves in his shoe and the traders.

And also, in a way to tell us to lower the tax such that it is beneficial for him, traders and the community.

3 ответов

18 просмотров

tooooo lazy to read all of that ! come on its 4:22 am here

All true. However CZ can make his own decision to reduce tax %. Doesn’t need vote from us. He has data on average trade volumes per user type so he could impose an appropriate % tax.

Good opinions, I agree

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта