we know that fees stay low once BCH maxes blocks again? The obvious answer is that we increase blocksize again but that leads to a circular argument. Where's the end?
"Low" is a relative term. For all we know, the free market equilibrium for the cost of on-chain txs will be higher in the future than it is now. But I think the important part is that we don't strangle the chain artificially. That's how we'll keep fees as-low-as-they-can-be. Also worth noting, the "official" blocksize limit is meaningless if miners have incentives to keep blocks smaller than that. Even without any official limit, there is the possibility for a free market equilibrium. https://youtu.be/zwQHovqJGDs
Обсуждают сегодня