far from thriving projects worth talking about right now.
TSwaps (not usable until someone takes ownership)
T-Starter (same)
Lips (never deployed on Telos)
Challenge DAC
HIVE (a partnership announced but still no action of any kind)
Telos Place (site is down)
BountyBlock (site is down)
Lightning Protocol (did anything happen with this?)
Telos Task (down but returning I believe)
Cryptolocally (closed down)
Farm Game (website down)
Sesacash (closed down)
Telos Governance Browser (points to empty page instead of telos.decidevoter.app where GoodBlock rebuilt a better version of the site)
DMail (dead project)
Qubicles (dead project)
Chirp.LA (dead project)
Unbiased (unknown status)
The EVM version of the page is a lot better, but I fear that people looking through the native page and clicking through would not be very impressed.
Thanks, we will get those taken care of tomorrow morning.
I'm not trying to make Telos look bad. I'm trying to make us look as awesome as we actually are. But to get there, I'm willing to make us look as disorganized as we actually are in some areas so that we can improve. This is an example where it's really easy to see and undeniable that I'm addressing real things that are being overlooked. I believe that I am doing the same thing when I bring up problems with lacking vision in the the marketing department and not enough exciting projects in the development pipeline. It's just much easier to see and verify my point of view on issues such as this.
Half of these are actually as far as we are aware still active. Some of them like lightning protocol are from my understanding just waiting for a project to come to them(part of the reason they are on the site). Telos task pretty sure is still going, spoke to them within last 3 months, challengedac still going, Lips have always said they were focusing on their web 2 product first. Just a few examples. So there are reasons they are there.
What is the goal for this page on the Telos website? Right now it looks like the aim is to show a lot of projects even if many aren't live or useable. In the past that was probably a reasonable approach, but now they detract from the projects that are good. The page should be curated so that not just any project affiliated with Telos gets listed, but those doing well. One very clear test would be if you can access their websites. Those shouldn't be there, I think. There were some on the page that I thought were questionable but omitted. But I'd also say that projects that are at present unusable (TSwaps) or that haven't been used at all yet (Lightning Protocol, perhaps) or not for a really long time (T-Starter) probably do not impress anyone who explores the site and therefore should not be included. I wouldn't be excited about a project that is featuring projects that never deployed or no longer exist. I'd much rather see a shorter, selective list of thriving projects.
Обсуждают сегодня