Hey Kameron, so better late than never, and not exactly a "counter" to Trim's stance, but here is far more information about how the B1 donation came about, along with my general views on moving forward in life and choosing to not allow the past to become poison. https://medium.com/@christopheraaronbarnes/b1s-500k-eos-donation-the-new-eos-in-2023-d4c6d1e0d34e
Right before election I consider this article as covert campaigning even though on EOS fireside chat you lied about being anti-campaigning
thats not fair, he was asked by a couple of people to write it prior elections
Yes 3 weeks ago. Just odd releasing it 24 hours to the election
Read your article. Where does EdenOnEOS draw the line? "Donations with no strings attached" Would EdenOnEOS also accept donations from FTX? Would it accept donations from hackers? Because....no strings attached?
You kind of contradict yourself when you say "The intentions of B1 have zero impact on the benefit that these funds can have for Eden and EOS" Yet in the same article you say In an “intent of code is law” approach, the humans that are actually using the coded blockchains can intervene in hacks, exploits, bugs, and other unintended outcomes. It is in these situations the fundamental question arises, who determines who the arbiters of truth are in a dispute. What, how, or who selects those that are able to subjectively interpret code and pass judgments?"
If we follow you logic @ChrisBarnes1 The members of EdenOnEOS or a dispute committee within EdenOnEOS should discuss if the organization should accept the donation OR not Since after all "Intent of code"
Обсуждают сегодня