billion in fees saved? I would have expected more noise and endorsement of skale as a scaling solution but so far these (excellent) milestones seem get noticed. Any thoughts on this?
Do you feel frustrated?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBdOPqE1x64
Hi Algernon, You can check it for yourself if you go to our Discord channel and asking the builders there: https://discord.com/invite/gM5XBy6 You might have also noticed the uptick in new dApp announcements, showing increasing interest in building on SKALE.
Not really, but I m curious what are the thoughts of the team? Why devs prefer a worse version of skale aka polygon, are there any barriers to migrate dapps from eth to skl?
Hi Algernon, SKALE, as a multichain network, is more comparable to Cosmos and Polkadot, than it is to Polygon. I've shared the nuances that this brings here: https://t.me/skaleofficial/309845
I did which is good but, so far skale behaves more like an independent L1 than a scaling solution to eth. The tech amount of money saved on fees seems insane, yet there is no rush for adoption
The economics of multichain networks for dApps is different.
SKALE is very much a layer on top of Ethereum. You're likely talking more about the economics of multichain networks, in terms of dApp proliferation.
Also, if you check the announcement channel: https://t.me/skalefoundation you'd see that announcements of new dApps building on SKALE are getting posted more and more frequently. Once you are on the announcement channel, you can use the keyword "breaking" for a quick search. A more intentional search might even reveal more.
More and more dApps choosing to build on SKALE is adoption.
Обсуждают сегодня