a single centralized entity?
Too lazy to build a healthy network
No, not just on Multichain. Axelar is also another option, but protocols on the Kava EVM widely use multichain assets.
kava obviously should take part responsibility for lost of multichain (if funds gone confirmed), I bridge to kava because of advertisement from kava rather than multichain.
Multichain is older and more stable and bigger than even KAVA, and has held Billions of USD in the past. I trusted it because of its proven record. I'm no fan of KAVA team. But when you're riding out to explore the wild west (of a new chain), you'd rather bring one trusted horse rather than a pack of horses with unproven experience.
I know both, and I know multichain bigger than kava, but I come to kava because of info from kava not multichain, no matter which is bigger, they can't just clear up and say it's not our problem, just use other bridges. so if other bridges has problem too, can kava just say not my problem every time? sure it's not kava's problem, but it's irresponsible. BTY, I am not saying they are responsible for all multichain affected users but only for kava evm affected.
Обсуждают сегодня