209 похожих чатов

Dear Sandbox team, I would like to express my disappointment and

dissatisfaction regarding the recent change in the required number of quests for the seasonal event. I have invested a significant amount of time and effort into completing 200 quests, only to find out that now only 50 quests are required. This change seems highly unfair to me.
I cannot understand the reason behind this change. Why reduce the number of quests if it means that other participants will have the same chances of winning by completing significantly fewer quests? This undermines my motivation and the contribution I made to completing the tasks.
I kindly request that you explain the reasons and motivation behind this change and consider the possibility of restoring the original requirement of completing 200 quests to maintain fairness and equal opportunities for all participants.
I understand that the change has already taken effect, but I would like to propose considering the option of providing additional rewards or bonuses to those who have already successfully completed 200 quests. This could compensate for the efforts and dedication of participants who have already met this requirement.
I hope for your understanding and willingness to consider this proposed option.
I look forward to your understanding and prompt response.

3 ответов

61 просмотр
Anton-Kuplevatskyi Автор вопроса

Please provide me with contact information through which I can directly reach out to you for further discussion and resolution of the issues related to the recent changes in the requirements for the seasonal event. I would prefer to contact you directly rather than going through Telegram or Discord groups. Thank you for your understanding. I look forward to receiving the contact information as soon as possible.

I think nothing will change and there will be no additional bonuses. may only consider issuing rewards within 10 days of the end of the event. not in 1-2 months.

Anton-Kuplevatskyi Автор вопроса
Sergey Sokolov
I think nothing will change and there will be no a...

As a dedicated participant who invested significant time and effort into completing the quests, I expected fair treatment and timely resolution. The current response fails to address the fundamental issue of fairness and disregards the efforts and commitment of participants like myself. I implore you to reconsider the decision and take into account the impact of these changes on the overall participant experience. By neglecting to provide adequate compensation or adjustment for those who completed 200 quests, the platform undermines its credibility and erodes trust among its user base. I urge you to escalate this matter to higher levels of management within the Sandbox team and advocate for a fair and satisfactory resolution. The lack of responsiveness and unwillingness to address the concerns of dedicated participants only serves to further erode trust in the platform. I demand a reevaluation of the situation and a commitment to providing a fair and equitable solution. Participants who completed 200 quests should not be left feeling disregarded and undervalued. It is crucial for the platform to uphold its promises and demonstrate a genuine commitment to the satisfaction and fairness of its user community. I expect a prompt and meaningful response addressing these concerns. I also request that you provide me with official contact details or an alternative point of contact within the organization to ensure that my concerns are appropriately addressed by higher authorities.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Hey everyone! I won’t focus too much on what this person said (it’s clear they don’t understand the scope of what TF and TELOSX are achieving), but I’ll put it simply for thos...
Ana Ojeda
2
Telos is at a pivotal moment. While ambitious projects like zkEVM and SNARKtor have shown promise, the delay in delivering EVM 2.0—a cornerstone of the ecosystem—is a growing ...
Trinidad
8
Except the wealthiest, people that buy crypto want to "cash out" at the end of the day, one way or another. Converting to fiat is craziness, converting to BTC is unwise. Hold ...
Erdelanax
2
Hello guys, hope you can help me with a quick question. I've staked some ZIL using Atomic Wallet some while ago and wanted to claim my rewards and unstake it. Atomic Wallet sa...
Martin | #bornbrave
14
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
"Since pnut can flip FTM easily, I'm swapping my FTM to pnut and hoping for a easy x5-x10" Perfect recipe for disaster. NFA but chances are, you'll end up as exit liquidity ...
C. A.
7
VIP-397 BNBx Oracle implementation upgrade Summary This proposal, if approved, will upgrade the implementation of the BNBx Oracle contract on Venus from version 1 (V1) to v...
Venus Announcements
2
For all those that keep asking why no pump? why this ? and why that...? Please close ur ewt chart and open 2 others - TOTAL (total mc) and BTC.D (btc dominance). Maybe BTC a...
Inn3r_G
19
Hello!!! Moved nodes to another server, but uptime is not transferred. now both servers are working, last time I did the same, only 2 nodes transferred uptime, can you plea...
Kamil
12
AMD status update? No longer in the plan but something might be around the corner later on Chinese partner? No longer in the plan. This market does not seem to be the top ...
Ben
6
Карта сайта