draw the line for any future incident caused by a bridge or major protocol?
It certainly isn't Kava's responsibility, so any action proposed is bona fide. However, officially endorsed or not, we can't pretend either that Multi tokens weren't heavily advertised by Kava, and its liquidity anointed with KAVA emissions.
Of course they were heavily advertised by Kava and in potential legal actions by affected users Kava might be a side as well. Just look how many giveaways they did with MC to encourage bridging and u can win back Kava tokens
so the CEO of a partner company getting arrested in China is Kava's responsibility? Use this example to your boss in your business and see his response
Not responsibility but possibly some liability.
so, like 0.0001%
Maybe like, 0.0002%
Yes. Liability comes in many forms, and even if that case doesn't have any contractual liability, it seems it has a clear reputational liability
Обсуждают сегодня