the scènes. But to get the best out of something like Syntropy is doing, you need a good fund to invest all the things to make that possible. I read the whole convo above between the C-members and the team, I can understand both sides.
But personally and edit me if I'm wrong, but ... if Syntropy is listed on other bigger exhanges that would be 99,99& more benifitial for Syntropy:
- To raise more funds
- To increase brand & product awareness
- To get more opinion positive as negative but overall more feedback to develop more, faster and easily
- More partnerships
Overall I don't see disadvantages
What is the reason or where is Syntropy waiting for? Cause we can built together on the best product ever, but if there is nobody interesting for than it's not enough to survive.
The question was answered during AMA: This is literally why we need this protocol which is blockchain native, using the token, and thousands of developers using the protocol in native way through the wallet etc. This gives true token utility and opens easier access to listing on exchanges and true adoption by the Web3 ecosystem. The surest path to listings as well as DEX volume is actually making a lot of data available and Web3 community using the protocol, this gives wallet count and adoption required to get approval of biggest exchanges.
Thanks Simas, but otherwise do the founders of Syntropy have directly contact with the CEO’s of big exchanges? Cause as strong organization as Syntropy with real utility, team, product, partners in the past and future … it’s for a big exchange also good to implement Syntropy inside their exchange to support the project but also to believe in the project. Soo …
Sadly I don’t have information if we have contact with the CEO’s of exchanges
Обсуждают сегодня