209 похожих чатов

I have a good comparison question? Why do we even

charge fees at all, or anything past 1 sat/byte? When bch and btc only bring in $150k and $450k

Full Block Fees $0.01 BCH vs $1.50 BTC
BCH $150k txs/fees/day, $45m block reward/day
BTC $450k txs/fees/day, $25m block reward/day

5 ответов

17 просмотров

it's a security feature basically. iirc from reading history we used to have free transactions, using coindays destroyed, then Satoshi added fees for anti-spam

we don't "charge" anything past 1sat/byte, but there are natural limits to how big blocks miners could mine with everyone paying 1sat/byte - once their orphan rates get to where it's not worth it, they will self-limit the sizes, and if there's still demand for TXes then users will start bidding more to prioritize their TX, and avg fees will go slightly up - but then also miners could afford to mine a little bigger, and it finds equilibrium

Rowan Skye
it's a security feature basically. iirc from readi...

Satoshi was long gone before free transactions using coindays destroyed were removed, and fees were a thing all along outside of that small batch of allowed-to-be-free transactions (for which you could also offer a fee if you so desired). I have personally made free high priority transactions, but I wasn’t on the scene until after Satoshi had left. This isn’t to say that Satoshi would have insisted on keeping them or that we should have them, just that Satoshi didn’t remove the feature.

Rowan Skye
it's a security feature basically. iirc from readi...

the idea of fees is that a TX pays for it's own security - all fees are payment for hashes; they're not payment for putting the TX in a block - they're a payment for securing the TX with a few more hashes, and when everyone's payments aggregate, they all together become more secure in the block they end up in each TX you make is also a transaction with a miner: you're chipping in and paying for few hashes. Of course miners would add _their own_ TX in a block :)

bitcoincashautist
the idea of fees is that a TX pays for it's own se...

I'd argue that your version is definitely over simplifying fees and their role. The main gist of my issue is that Core evolved fees to be something that corrupts the system from within. And I think we're going to have to re-evaluate it from first principles in the medium term in order to keep our system healthy.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта