developments but the way and sorry for the marketing side, I see on that side very less and bad marketing stategies. If a very good project as Syntropy is working on a solution for the world with real utilties and product, the team behind the marketing have to promote than really smoothly and consistenly.
If there is a AMA for the new developments of the developer side, and there are only 14 people inside the ama - 5 from the team? Now a days, people are walking like sheeps beforehand and afterwards they will look if they walked right enough. What I mean, we have to grow dramastically, otherwise the team itself will use Syntropy and the rest don't.
End of the day people are looking at numbers also, why would we, he, she invest and use the product if the organization itself is not even doing little bit own effort to become more available inside the space.
Loyal people will support the organization on a certain point you know.
So you say? Cause Syntropy is small that is the reason Elon was not interesting to handle further with us? Buddy, if that is the case ... than the whole thing what I conclude to market Syntropy in a better way is here the answer on. @k1ybas buddy I mean nothing to you do, but in general. It's couple years later after launch and we see developments on developments but less recognizing.
My point was that there aren’t many companies that work with Musk’s corporation in any way, Emilis wasn’t the priority guy of the marketing back in the days when the integration with Starlink was launched. There was a concept of working both Web2 and Web3 ways as I mentioned thus the reason for the marketing efforts not fully enlightening the stage of Web3. Also, let’s not forget that Syntropy is an IT company, working on technologies that take years to develop. It’s obviously easier to marketing something that brings no value to the Web3, but rather brings the price up for a short period of time by using hundreds of thousands dollars in the early stage. Either way, we’re in a downtrend & uptrend season at the same time and timing is crucial at the moment. Our further path with Data Layer will be crucial for us technology and adaptation wise, utility will determine the real use and that’s where we’ll gladly market the available documentation. On the other hand, building anticipation and hyping up the crowd is something to learn from the past and it’s a different topic I’m sure Emilis himself could comment about.
Обсуждают сегодня