that it’s 100% untrue that they wanted to make sure EOS is free from SEC scrutiny?
No. Both those things can be true. If they want to do something to help EOS, let’s see it. Until then I won’t expect anything from them.
They secretly wound down EOS operations while telling a vulnerable and broken community everything’s going to be alright
Self fulfilling prophesy.
Very natural. Because they were afraid of being blamed.
If they had the communities best interests at heart and couldn’t move because of SEC they wouldn’t secretly stop EOS development
Obviously first priority was their self preservation. What would you have done if you were them? Can you put community first then your own self preservation?
They have $12b as you’ve pointed out
How $12B i recently saw a x-post showing 164k btc. That would be around $6B with actual price
After the XRP case there is no valid reason for B1 to not financially support EOS because of the SEC all this is a lie.
Exactly. Now they have one more reason why B1 should financially support and come back to EOS.
ok, so we need a half a billion investment to boost EOS. But why would B1 do that? They are distancing themselves from EOS like they've never been here
Macro condition is ripe except for the internal sentiment. I guess there's many upside for B1 as well if EOS & B1 reconcile. If B1 buys 100m of tokens and enable 140k BTC wrapped on EOS for institutions via their Bullish network on profi(KYC + compliance layer) in this macro condition is a true game changer. Other altcoins simply cannot compete with this combination and no one can copy this. If EOS community allows them coming back to EOS and finance ENF to develop Profi layer.. It's a vision of trillions of $$$ not, billions. If this happens.. B1 will benefit from: 1) For their finance, their 10% token purchase will skyrocket 2) Their reputation can recover 3) They achieve the original vision they hoped to achieve from early on. Narrative of reconciliation will make great optics for outside as well. So there's many reason why they should consider coming back. Besides.. it's a very positive market signal if EOS & B1 emits narrative of reconciliation. After all, it's not just about only money. It's means EOS being a bridge of massive wealth transfer in this apocalyptic age. Isn't BTC created exactly for a time like this? The thing is that BTC anarchos don't like govts and KYC, EOS can be THE BRIDGE in the middle for the massive wealth transfer from collapsing fiat world into crypto world.
but nothing prevented them from doing that in the past 6 years. They could deploy their solutions any time they wanted. They simply didn't want.
nah. They just want to legalize the ICO profits. There's no motivation for them to develop the long-term market
Well after the community freeze a large amount of assets its unterstandable that they get more carefull
Keeping the door open is too painful, people tend to shut their door closed.
before the freeze, they had several years to do something. But there was no strategy or intent about EOS
Agree. B1 has a bad reputation, but if it helps with EOS prices, I hope give up our pride and compromise. Price is more important than. "NEW EOS" didn't show anything in terms of price. After they drove out B1 and Dan, the price went down 1/10 and the market ranking went from 30th to 60th. It's not just a price drop, it's a continuous decline in the market ranking, so please recognize that we are in the wrong way. Even if B1 does nothing, just by being in the background, the status of EOS will rise. (But I don't know if B1 would want it too..)
I agree with you
It’s important to note not all of their “assets were frozen”. The vesting simply stopped, because they stopped. They still had a bunch of liquid tokens and RAM, no one even considered doing anything to those tokens.
Sure but it was a line which makes you think how far the community would go. (If i were in their position)
Without eos find its identity it will soon become a commodity chain that compete with numbers and will be outpaced by numbers by other chain.
Stopping the vesting seems to be the system working as intended. The point of vesting is you earn it over time. The token holders decided they weren't earning it.
I would be more carefull to deploy capital after this. If i saw how narratives pop up quickly and action gets taken.
Обсуждают сегодня