Please don't read my comments as saying B1 did no

Question

Please don't read my comments as saying B1 did no

wrong...i've never said that. What I agree with, that others here have pointed out, is I'd rather any large whale get involved with EOS, and what large whale might have more reasons than others to give to this community...B1...thats the whale. So if you care about the token price, then its irrational to say we don't want B1 to get involved.

What we shouldn't do is rely on them, trust them, or any of that, but if they want to throw money at us, then why would we argue against that?

And if they were to consider such a thing, sentiment absolutely would matter, hence why these conversations matter.

#blockchain #cryptocurrency #english #eos

0

23.10.2023

8 ответов

20 просмотров

Chris Barnes Автор вопроса

Sagarmatha (i block and report private messages immediately)
Ppl think if we take money we lose strenght in the...

ya such a smoke screen that argument was. We've heard from ENF people themselves that the case they are leading won't actually benefit the network, just some EOS holders. So why again would B1 giving money to entities within EOS that are working to promote and grow the network be bad for it? Completely irrational.

0

23.10.2023

Stonehenge

you (and 1 or 2 others) keep implying that the circumstances are a result of the sentiment, and not the driver of it. more specifically, that b1 won't 'do anything constructive unless the sentiment towards them changes. which of course is ludicrous. it's like saying "the beatings will continue until morale improves".

0

23.10.2023

Chris Barnes Автор вопроса

Stonehenge
you (and 1 or 2 others) keep implying that the cir...

Sentiment is a contributor, not the only aspect leading to the results we've seen. With B1, sentiment matters, but sure its not the only thing that would make a decision for them to engage or not. Others have pointed out that an alignment of interests, and b1 having shareholders that would clearly have profit driven motives would also play heavily on any actions they might take. But to assume sentiment doesn't matter is a mistake, bc it most certainly would. Good luck pitching to a board of engaging with EOS again when everyone here screams they want nothing to do with B1. Currently however it seems not everyone is screaming this anymore...some are sure, but its not all one sided.

0

23.10.2023

Stonehenge

Chris Barnes
Sentiment is a contributor, not the only aspect le...

a bunch of random people on the internet don't like that b1 has been derelict. and you're saying this negative sentiment contributes significantly to preventing b1 from doing what everyone (except them) understands they should have done a long time ago. so, in essence, you keep saying that the the beatings will continue until morale improves. and i'm telling you it's the other way around. also, it's absurd that a business like that would act in such a petty, emotional manner. i guess that's partly what makes them so incompetent.

0

23.10.2023

Chris Barnes Автор вопроса

Stonehenge
a bunch of random people on the internet don't lik...

I'm not saying any of those things Channel 4 News. Sentiment matters...yes, "contributes significantly" thats subjective, but again yes obviously sentiment would have a role to play in decision making. I didn't say anything about continued beatings, especially since I don't think B1 has any EOS left to sell based on the onchain accounts many were following...inflationary pressures are a bigger deal from that perspective, and have nothing to do with b1. I don't think its incompetent for a biz to decide to not deploy capital into an ecosystem that hates them...lol...hard to get a return on that move. But to yours and other's point, nothing is stopping B1 from acting, and so they should. I'm just not sure how easy that is to pull off with regards to having shareholders to convince. Its a tough sell is all...

0

23.10.2023

Stonehenge

Chris Barnes
I'm not saying any of those things Channel 4 News....

it's utterly bizarre that you keep implying b1's dereliction is even partly caused by the community's negative sentiment toward them, and not the other way around.

0

23.10.2023

Chris Barnes Автор вопроса

Stonehenge
it's utterly bizarre that you keep implying b1's d...

I'm incorporating common sense. I'm not implying that sentiment is the only thing B1 cares about, but you'd be a touch myopic to not see that it is a factor in decision making.

0

23.10.2023

Sagarmatha (i block and report private messages immediately) · Accepted Answer

Sagarmatha (i block and report private messages immediately)

Ppl think if we take money we lose strenght in the law suit. There are theories that b1 would just flattering us intentionally in case they give money in order to weaken us.

0

23.10.2023

210 похожих чатов

Please don't read my comments as saying B1 did no

8 ответов

Похожие вопросы