I'd saying governing EOS. He is the king maker, and doing so with zero skin in the game.
who has zero skin?
Yeah that was another assumption.
I believe Mo said that about Tony.
Tony has a fuckload of EOS lol
"Tony" ... but good question, I should retract that. I haven't seen his EOS account.
He has all the freedom to do, if it was his money. But the power he was wielding was NOT his. Who the hell knew Tony for all the decision making power he hijacked?
Actually, although I was taking Tony as an example. There's a few more.
Does that give him the right to vote with a fuckload of multiples more than what he personally owns, without the explicit consent of the owners of those tokens?
Yes. He has their explicit consent. If they don’t want him to vote with their tokens, don’t give him their tokens
Interesting. This is a side of DPOS that should be exposed for all of blockchain. It sucks that we're exposing our flaws first...but maybe it turns into a #metoo movement, and we get all the vote brokers exposed.😂
Haha, EOS has been loudly talking about its flaws since forever... maybe it shouldn't be a surprise.
Many will find it uncomfortable. lol
Sometimes I think that's all we talk about, but it has been very well studied that humans enjoy bonding more by complaining.
They didn't give him their tokens, they left them on their exchange. The exchange gave Tony their tokens voting rights. I wonder if a vote broker voted to 2x the total number of tokens, allocating 50% of that to himself and his friends, and went on to sell them for USD and move them to a bank, is that theft, or code is law? Would the exchange be held to account?
I think the blockchain ecosystem has grown large enough so that we can reach out to other governance minded people on other blockchains that have their governance issues, and get everyone talking. If this can't be solved on the blockchain layer, maybe regulation(scary word) is needed.
Institutions upcoming.
Обсуждают сегодня