He's not only representing his own token as a whale. But he's representing 22m tokens custodied. He has to be held accountable.
You have a personal axe to grind I think, you may need to separate that out from the larger issue.
But when B1 was running a proxy with 100m that was fine and now you want them back?
I'd argue it's not just 1. These questions exist. And their being transparency is a selling point for the blockchain he owns a fuckload of tokens of, and would increase their value. A case can be made that whales, dare I say it, should be active in the community?
I'm voting on behalf of you with your tokens. And you don't know me who I am. Is it a large whale not talking to random community member?
So 2% of the token supply? That's a lot in some sense, but still not a majority stake by any means
Without Tony’s votes, you can’t ever be a TOP 21 BP, even if you are vote-buying. What it effectively implies is that the current incumbent TOP 21 structure is almost unchangeable, and thus there’s virtually no way.
Обсуждают сегодня