including me, sympathize with the parts that Enf is currently leading and doing well, but the problem with Bp is different.
https://validate.eosnation.io/eos/producers/?paid=y;regproducer=n
I don't know if this link doesn't bring up the latest data, but the information that's currently showing can check 22 standby bps that get bp pay but do nothing.
Also serious is this link.
https://validate.eosnation.io/eos/producers/?top21=y;regproducer=n
9bp of Top 21bp that don't seem to do anything.
I don't know if it's just an information update, but the latest information seems to be consistent with what I said.
Please understand if it's my fault.
There are currently 2 bp running history nodes. Am I the only one concerned?
My sense is that while some do think it's an issue, it's not a priority. They hope to "fix" governance with future consensus mechanism changes. Right now the status quo wants to focus on what ENF and Labs are doing, and not disrupt them by causing turbulence with BP selection.
Enf should do something about this
Zack often talks about limited engineering resources. I suspect there are others who can propose updates to the REX code that aren't working on ENF projects. Chris Barnes may be more familiar with resources in that regard. It can't *just* be ENF payroll engineers that can do the work. The harder part will be to get a 15/21 vote to pass the proposal.
What makes a BP undiscoverable? Surprised to see Defibox on that list. Do you have a link for how they can be discovered?
The link you just shared is undiscoverable 😂 Does it work for anyone else?
Обсуждают сегодня