210 похожих чатов

Again, this solution has great potential to solve the concerns

of 3 of you (@TheRealTrimBot, https://t.me/EOSproject/2009862) (@jestagram https://t.me/EOSproject/2009924) (@brandonlovejoy https://t.me/EOSproject/2009870)

So, instead of continuing to discuss and analyze the problem, why not change your mind and try to jump to directly discussing the solution to the problem? Maybe it will bring greater ideological inspiration.

Because this solution may bring huge improvements to EOS in many aspects such as governance and value.

3 ответов

14 просмотров

@jestagram let's say non-ENF engineers can be found to code this, and test it on Jungle, is the proposal itself worth consideration? I'm trying to separate Zack's feedback that engineering resources are unavailable.

cHeXtacean (Stauffelbaker Acolyte)
@jestagram let's say non-ENF engineers can be foun...

Also there's the issue you identified of overlapping w IF work. That also needs to be addressed.

I'm in favor of discussing stuff like this, and (depending on the conditions) would support changes like this. At the very least debating them and seriously considering them. Resources just need to be put into the exact plan and that needs to be presented. Code, numbers, schedule, etc. I just personally am too overloaded to spearhead that - and I know many others working in the space are too.

Похожие вопросы

Карта сайта