of 3 of you (@TheRealTrimBot, https://t.me/EOSproject/2009862) (@jestagram https://t.me/EOSproject/2009924) (@brandonlovejoy https://t.me/EOSproject/2009870)
So, instead of continuing to discuss and analyze the problem, why not change your mind and try to jump to directly discussing the solution to the problem? Maybe it will bring greater ideological inspiration.
Because this solution may bring huge improvements to EOS in many aspects such as governance and value.
@jestagram let's say non-ENF engineers can be found to code this, and test it on Jungle, is the proposal itself worth consideration? I'm trying to separate Zack's feedback that engineering resources are unavailable.
Also there's the issue you identified of overlapping w IF work. That also needs to be addressed.
I'm in favor of discussing stuff like this, and (depending on the conditions) would support changes like this. At the very least debating them and seriously considering them. Resources just need to be put into the exact plan and that needs to be presented. Code, numbers, schedule, etc. I just personally am too overloaded to spearhead that - and I know many others working in the space are too.
Обсуждают сегодня