209 похожих чатов

Yes the goal should be to have light non trusting

wallets. But in 50 years nobody will even want to look at block 2 anymore the old tx are basically all wasted space if we manage got keep proof without them.

And the UTXO set should grow slower than the history of tx which means at some point it is more efficient to keep the UTXO set instead of all the history. So assuming the problem with light wallets can be solved this would be a viable path into the future. right?

3 ответов

22 просмотра

Its not a "problem with light wallets", really. It is that we have a solution inherent in the design of Bitcoin that ties transactions to the blockheader. There is no such concept for UTXOs. Check chapter 7 of the bitcoin whitepaper of what Satoshi suggested we can do to delete old transactions. The trick is to think about it as deleting old transactions instead of deleting old blocks. Notice also that 50 years from now nobody is going to care at all about an extra 200GB storage space. We're seeing 30TB drives being sold. People starting to already get 100MB/second Internet connections at home addresses.

Remora_101🟢- Автор вопроса
Tom
Its not a "problem with light wallets", really. I...

Yes this is the other path, nobody cares about storage. I'll have to take a lock again at the whitepaper and try to get a level deeper.

Tom
Its not a "problem with light wallets", really. I...

Yeah, I recently bought six 10 TB enterprise quality drives for a raid Z2 array in my NAS. $130 per drive. There is no need for fast nodes to hold the entire chain, not even the merchant nodes, let alone the mining nodes, which are must run in hard real time. All that is needed is for some nodes, maybe only entirely off line, to be able to eventually prove that the working chain is valid. With check points, these proofs can be done separately, since a single block hash covers the entire chain up to a particular block. And note: existing node software does not fully validate the entire block chain. There are checkpoints built into each release. (But there are command line switches to do full verification on IBD.)

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта