No - not really - we use antelope.io but we have our own governance model
It uses the same protocol software, similar to how polkadot chains use substrate and cosmos chains use tendermint. Unlike those ecosystems, all antelope chains are entirely independent, while I believe Cosmos and polkadot somehow all have a hub and spoke model with Polkadot/Cosmos at the center. But no fork or anything like Ethereum/EthereumClassic, and our EVM we built ourselves, which is where a majority of our activity is, and has nothing to do with any other networks at all. When we launched Telos 5yrs ago we significantly changed the validator selection model, as well as many other things. Most importantly, the centralized statements around EOS are generally based on the ICO and initial distribution which had a significant whale problem, and those whales effectively controlled the network (along with exchanges who vote with their users custodial funds). On Telos we didn’t launch with that same whale problem and voting with custodial funds is strictly against the rules via our governance rules we established, as Justin mentioned.
how many validator telos has so far
Depends on how you measure a validator
so telos running by the team?
Here's where I answer that in more detail
Can I have a simplified answer, would like to use the text for a tweet
Simplified would be no - Telos is not a fork of Eos, just uses the same codebase called Antelope that is also used by other networks like Wax, Proton, UX.
Обсуждают сегодня