not sold in USDC instead of FRAX? 🤔 That would allow us to siphon liquidity/vampire attack Circle and increase the circulating supply of FRAX since it would essentially just become a conversion mechanism. Purchasing in FRAX does not have that additional benefit.
Please read the docs ser
The docs state that “FXBs allow the formation of a yield curve to price the time value of lending FRAX back to the protocol itself.” I’m positing whether there’s higher economic incentive of siphoning liquidity from USDC to expand the FRAX supply.
Please think about what you are saying - work through the flows in your mind - knowing that the liability for final settlement is FRAX
Right, as I mentioned in my original comment, this would essentially be unwrapping USDC into fiat, and then wrapping it again as FRAX. It juts moves the fiat from the Circle treasury and into the FRAX RWA custodial entity for us to benefit from interest yield.
It’s all the same doesn’t matter what you buy it with
This is the point I’m trying to make, buying with USDC increases the fiat holdings of the custodial entity, which would increase the available supply of FRAX.
Обсуждают сегодня