It is NOT about the value TODAY AGIX holders LOSE 57%

of ASI tokens.

Do you get it?

Everyone expects ASI to fly.

I do.

I want to have as much ASI as possible.

Why should I give up 57% of it via a stinky 0.43:1 ratio?

If you want to have a higher ratio but others are automatically disadvantaged does not work

Why should you get more then you deserve 🤣🤣🤣

I would ask the same of the Fetch community

The brother wants to make money glitch like in gta

Why should I be bullied to buy re-brandes FET (ASI) ?

We get 1:1 the value in $/€ like you

You should be happy to switch to such a great chain

You can sell any move on if you are not happy with the current situation

I would be But not at 0.43:1 ratio

It isn’t about the present dollar value. I can sell today and get the same result. The question is the future potential. And now and am back seated with a non equal share. Looking at MC alone over a 15 day window is a terrible way to value.

youre welcome to join the conversation on singularitynet community side but kindly behave a bit

mate you will have less coins but at a higher market price so you won't lose out

Okay, but how do you want to do it differently?

Who are you talking to about deserving? SNet ecosystem is where the lions share of the AI tech-stack value is. It's not even close

Where do you have real applications?

That’s just your opinion. No free money for you guys

Renegotiate the pretend "locked" values to 1:1 agix to asi

That will happen in your dream 🙃🙃

In the beginning i did also not agree but after some deep thinking i asked myself, why its not fair? We get exactly the same amount of money and fet also and ocean also. Fetch will get more inflation because agix has still inflation to come the coming years. So for us its quite an honest deal? Or why think you its not?

No, hypercycle is objective reality. Nunet is objective reality. Sdao is objective reality

Longer look period. Perhaps 18 month. And consider Enterprise Value.

Hahaaha nice joke the brother then makes free money and we automatically lose money

Then you will double you money overnight. Who is going to pay this?

No, FET will gain access to snet ecosystem components which it needsnto compete. Snet does not need fet

Partly agree with that. Think for yourself a few minutes. Why do you think Ben wants this?

No In this case fet should wait till agix has the same ratio…also 0.8 would be acceptable. But not a 0.43

And transient market pumps are an absurd way to assess. Based the FET community's apparent lack of ability to see that it gains more out of this joining (which it's leadersndo see) makes this look as a lost cause

Because he has a lot of hypc and ntx…maybe this 2 get pushed by that.

Why are you so arrogant to think you are something better you have a sex robot that's it We are supported by bosch, telekom, gaia x and catena

Ben is trully not after money. Please read all his books. He is putting his whole life in this

Everyone need snet, snet is the king🙃🙃🙃

can you stop the trolling? thanks

Ok so your idea, no merge wait for agix to do x2 then we merge ? You know you can’t control the market ? Maybe fet will do x4 by then and we will be asking for 1:0.2 by then

Why you let the people speak nonsense about your partner like others are so bad they need snet etc.

Great. But we can’t all be Ben. Some of us need to consider the financial implications of a bad conversion rate negotiation.

Doesn‘t matter. I want agix to continue with 2.0…But a merge with fairer ratio would be acceptable

Agree also with that

cmon we're not in your groups doing the same

In fetch group nobody talking shit about Agix. That’s show the level of this channel

i meant we're not there talking shit about you

Still i think together we can be greater then one of us alone. I think personly Ben is worried that alone it takes him to long to scale hyperon up as he does not have the compute and not have the funds and not have the ai platform like fetch ai with agents that can learn hyperon from very quickly. His agi framework need compute and interactions to learn. I personally think that ben thinks this is the fastest way to do this and he has the most change to dont get over run by big tech. As big tech is going so fast if it takes him to long big tech will develop agi and comes into the S curve into ASI

There is a great chance if AGIX was trading on CB it would be about $3 per token. It is not an apples to apples comparison. It is one company's better marketing that puts it into a more favorable situation to negotiate a deal. SingularityNet is not inferior in any way to Fetch. So just because we're traded at a 57% discount CURRENTLY does not mean they have to make a deal today.

True but it isn't. Can't put prices on hypotheticals

I agree with that. Snet should make the hyperon alpha and then do the deal

I am not saying it should be. What I'm saying is that if it's not in your favor, don't make a deal

How can there be a deal when there was no vote before

Exactly, they're talking about it as if it's a done deal.

Sometimes you have to look at what’s best for the company to grow and not what is best strictly based on short term gains

100%. Fetch invested in the network affect with the exchange listings and benefits from the start of this cycle. SN did not and continued to invest in technology. The conversion ratio devalues SN technology and rewards Fetch exchange listings. Terrible timing. Terrible deal.

True. But then at the end you have to represent best interests.

False choice. Both aspects are perfectly compatible with renegotiating a fair deal. Let's stop pretending that thongs cannot be negotiated prior to a rejection vote.

Depending on the size of your bag, when / if ASI is trading at let's say $1,000 per token, you will remember this stinky deal and wished it was a 1:1 ratio. I'm not thinking short-term. I'm thinking long very long term

💯

That's laughable since I've read the fet chats and I'm pretty sure Ben's been called just about everything

Will a snapshot be taken for the distribution of the new ASI token? Or was it already taken for current holders?

there's no need for snapshots

But we give away 2/3 of our voting power. Once again: FIAT does not matter, it is worthless anyway.

works both ways right, we'd also gain voting power on new topics

But our community will influence less of any new topic

The topic is already set. Decentraliced, beneficial AI for everyone. And i do not see how to secure the topic, with giving away our voting power.

You definitely don’t get it. It’s important that everyone understand that point : no one will lose any money during the merge (perhaps just a few percent due to arbitrage between tokens) Let me explain. You talk about 57% depreciation because 1 AGIX = 0.43 ASI Then yes, we will have 57% less token. BUT The price of ASI will be 1/0.43= 2.32 higher than the price of AGIX (taken at the date of the snapshot). Make the math : 0.43 x 2.32 = ??? Ok hope you get it. Just imagine how inconceivable it would be for Singularitynet teams to accept a deal where all tokens holder lose 57% of their value (USD) because of the deal. I mean, ask yourself a second , come on …

Exactly!

Well said

Remember you are free to sell your AGIX and buy FET today. They way you will get the 1:1 but will be in the same position as if you had just held your AGIX

True that

because they chose at bad date to set the ratio. they could have picked any date but chose a date AFTER fetch massively outperformed agix and ocean instead of before. if they didnt the ratio would be different.

Or we can just vote no.

Yeah bad day, they should’ve done it today instead of Monday so agix get 0.42 instead of 0.433

This would always happen, this day would have been better for us, this day for us and so on. Snapshots are commonly used in the industry for setting prices. Using MC is a fair way to do it. Once you move onto what tech etc people have, it becomes very subjective and everybody will feel they bring the most to the table. The only real other alternative would be to bring in an M&A consultant to value both the market share, tech, team etc. but that a) drags out the process b) add huge cost to the process

Of course. I still strongly believe there is something bigger in the works and you may regret a no vote.