Messieurs, is it only me, or is it almost like

most of opponents of the merge didn't read the vision paper? What is this about the price all the time. This is not about the price at this very moment, this is about superior technological advancement, price be damned near term it does not matter, what matters is the final product for the betterment of all.

Why don't you get it? In case ASI would 10x in the coming years (which is a long way to 75billion$, it which is only possible with SNET Tech like Opencog Hyperon), then Agix holders will only have a 4.3x... that's a big big difference which is paid by SNET community! Do you really rhink that's fair?

Differential treament of communities and their tokens, with which for some of us is a predatory deal articulated upon a distorted valuatio DOES MATTER. Your argumentation is based on a very dangerous and widely debunked priciple in philosophy: "The end justifies the means" Some of us are concerned not only about the WHAT but also, and importantly, about the HOW (and also, why not about the WITH WHO). This said, the vision paper has a bit of that "end-justifies-the-means" flavour. And many people that haven't fallen for the FOMO the merger, have fallen by that dangerous general idea that the only thing that maters is the goal, and thus not the process. Also, many people do not trust SNET previous ideals and their ability to keep flowing independently. I do not blame them. But I do not believe so. Ben and team were doing a great job, slightly delayed in some task yet to complete. But In the end they would have gotten there... and they had an ample time advantage because of the disrupted of the tech they are developing. That is what Humayun and cols. wanted to so eagerly to not loose the race. But not only they did not payed a fair valuation for that tech, actually they have comvinced many, including the team that SNET community (AGIX holders) must payed them for our technology, loosing leverage and actually the bussines opportunity frame of a better and more adjusted to real value deal. At this point in these days conversation I do not expect any of you to understand this or even have a deep thought about it. The only thing that I ask tou is not minisiming our arguments with falacies.

stop spamming this nonsense - it's wrong

Ser, are you all right?

seek help, for real

I think he's a paid spammer.

ad hominem, falacy.

ad hominem, falacy.

who pays you to spam this over and over?

who should be paying domeone defending the clearly loosing option?

you yourself is the loser if you didn’t notice yet

Pure speculation

Great argumentative power displayed here. 👍

All you're doing is speculating on aspects of the deal you have no knowledge of and then convincing yourself it's the objective truth

Exactly the same especulation then, using your rethoric, that the merger will better the chances of AGI. What is not especulation is that AGIX holders will loose 57% of their nominal tokens. That is a fact. It is also a fact, that with that loss, and without any other per-deal assurance or comoensation, we will loose utility exchange-for-services power with the same 57%. Fetch holders won't, that is also a fact. Can you disoute any of this with facts or will you need to source your arguments with especulation and false (as in not yet occured or intrinsecally wrong) expectations of goodness coming from the merger?

« We will loose utility exchange-for-services power with the same 57% », this is not true. Everything is pegged to FIAT (and probably USD in that case) so you will loose nothing.

U are so slow buddy

Do you think you have better insight into the potential success of the merger than the teams of each project themselves?

This is just an appeal to authority. I don't personally agree with DrF but the argument "listen to your betters" is not the best.

They've given reasons, it's not an appeal to authority. I'm not going to list out every reason they've given

the argument for merger is completely separate from the argument for the proposed ratios. the two issues are wholly independent.

this is 100% false. AGIX holders take a permanent 56% slash pre-merge on top of a large % inflation in supply. every % that ASI goes up FOREVER will result in a lower dollar value increase for AGIX holders... actually greater than 56% lower.

Show me your maths because I don’t understand your point.

The proposed ratios are based on the most objective measure they have, the end.

that's a blatant lie. the end

What's more objective than a publicly traded token price. Try not to speculate on supposed nefarious actions by fetch team

see my last post...

i don't even know where to start... your arguments are completely out of context and ignore fundamental concepts such as market capitalization etc. You're basically saying that 1 ETH should be convertible into 1 BTC - genius!

Yeah thats strange you are right i looked into golem discord not only one person mentioned the merger although this massively affects there market position as a depin computing ai coin, so strange

Monsieur kindly don't engage in conversation with this gentleman, as it is waste of your precious time

Not sure i understand kind monsieur.

Exactly, the best they have, not the best they could get.

Are BTC and ETH going to do a merger? If so what I am saying is that their valuation should take innaccoun everything, also fundamental value, no only marketcap or token value. So I now understand whybyou don't know where to start. Because it seems youndo not know.