209 похожих чатов

Exchange .bitcoin .com was leased to a 3rd party ages

ago. Is that what you are thinking?

18 ответов

51 просмотр

Стикер

I mean just take a look at https://news.bitcoin.com/ Is there only BTC/BCH news there? No. Multi-coin enterprise

Cheapy-🪐🌭 Автор вопроса

Roger never sold his stake in the company. But things certainly changed under other CEOS.

Roger is sole owner.

The legal documents for the court case in Seychelles and Hong Kong Roger vs coin flex Marc lamb. I don’t have a link though.

Fiendish Crypto
The legal documents for the court case in Seychell...

OK, good enough. Still, what I meant is that Roger does not run it himself and the Bitcoin.com service was engaged in shitcoinery for a long time. Now they are pivoting back to BCH, which is better.

But they still promote "login", cloud backup, and offer "buy" for an empty wallet. I normally recommend Flowee Pay these days, the missing "ZMW" currency does not seem to be important; most people know the ZMW/USD rate anyway.

He told me that himself, may even have been on air when we did the episode together but I can't remember exactly

ErdoganTalk jackson
But they still promote "login", cloud backup, and ...

I'm still planning to deliver this for you, I know it's been freaking ages since we've looked into it though

Jeremy
I'm still planning to deliver this for you, I know...

But you probably already have too much on your notepad, so I won't complain more

to be fair, being a full owner of the wallet that is still BY FAR the most used wallet in our space, then then letting it be slowly turned into the polar opposite is actively hurting the BitcoinCash uptake and ecosystem. A lot of those people may just wanted to use it as cash, but the wallet is "IN YOUR FACE" making it about gambling and number go up. It is promoting various coins and tokens that have nothing to do with BCH. Its like MacOS ships with Edge and all allows all sorts of Microsoft commercials inside the main apple apps. I don't think it is unfair to think that the most logical conclusion from Shadow here was that Roger had sold it. Frankly, if he still fully owns it isn't that worse?

don't assign rationale and intent, though. It is easy to just assume he "was busy with other stuff".

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта