vs what people actually say/are going to testify are very different. That’s why he was released because there was no actual evidence to hold him.
https://www.nytimes.com/article/andrew-tate-arrests-explained.html https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66581218 https://apnews.com/article/andrew-tate-human-trafficking-romania-court-appeal-33c380daebab86e309b5b787b550fcab
Still 0 evidence as the article itself describes
0 evidence he was arrested for "attacking governments".
I did not claim he was arrested for that. Only suggested it makes it more likely :)
Either way, this should continue in FFA, not here!
He openly admits to exploiting people here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKibLhAGP1A and in many other interviews. So is it likely that some of the MANY people he exploited complained? Yes. Did he also talk shit about governments sure? Did that then cause them to take the complaints a bit more seriously? MAYBE. It could be a bit of both. Hes still a douche nozzle. its not like he was just some pure libertarian trying to change the world by informing people about the dangers of inflation. He actively exploits men and women. What a hero.....
All voluntary interaction.
If only was some word we use when you trick people into giving you money....
I give you a jpeg on the blockchain. You give me 1 bch. Is that voluntary? Yes.
I tell you that if you buy this jpeg it will equal a plane ticket so you can come hump my sister.... then it doesnt. Whats that then?
Обсуждают сегодня