209 похожих чатов

Interesting but zk snarks itself is not possible due to

the scripting of algorithmic smart contracts not possible right?

8 ответов

27 просмотров

zkSNARKS is a suspicious and dangerous tech, that is backdoored by the government with very high probability. Until somebody makes a whitepaper that is readable and understandable for an average cryptography expert like me or @bitcoincashautist , then nobody should touch any zk-Anything tech. Until we can debug this shit and change the inside algo, it's too dangerous.

Adaptive Blocksize Limit
😂😂😂😂😂

not joking here, bro. zkSNARKs require pretty much 2 faculties in cryptography and 2 in math to even understand the whitepaper. Huge number of researchers who engage in it behave extremely suspiciously. Satoshi was very smart and cunning which is why he predicted that some Elyptic Curve cryptography is probably backdoored. Well, I am also like that, I can sense danger extremely well. zkSNARKS are dangerous. Stay away.

Adaptive Blocksize Limit- Автор вопроса
Shadow Of Harbringer 👁️🧀
not joking here, bro. zkSNARKs require pretty muc...

I know they are back door this is why I laughed when you said this shit

Adaptive Blocksize Limit- Автор вопроса
bitcoincashautist
not sNarks, sTarks

RingCT seems to be the superior if I am not mistaken right?

bitcoincashautist
not sNarks, sTarks

"SNARKs and STARKs are zero-knowledge proof technologies that allow one party to prove to another that a statement is true without revealing any further information. Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) have been garnering a lot of attention across an array of use cases for their transformative potential for enhancing security, protecting user privacy, and supporting scaling with layer-2 networks. ZKPs enable one party to prove to another party that a statement is true without revealing any additional information. ZKPs are both beneficial for increasing privacy—since they reduce the amount of information shared between parties—and scalability, since they allow proofs to be verified at a faster rate than if the entire data set would have to be verified. Two prominent zero-knowledge proof systems are SNARKs and STARKs. In this article, we’ll dive into what they are, how they work, and their key differences."

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта