the scripting of algorithmic smart contracts not possible right?
zkSNARKS is a suspicious and dangerous tech, that is backdoored by the government with very high probability. Until somebody makes a whitepaper that is readable and understandable for an average cryptography expert like me or @bitcoincashautist , then nobody should touch any zk-Anything tech. Until we can debug this shit and change the inside algo, it's too dangerous.
not joking here, bro. zkSNARKs require pretty much 2 faculties in cryptography and 2 in math to even understand the whitepaper. Huge number of researchers who engage in it behave extremely suspiciously. Satoshi was very smart and cunning which is why he predicted that some Elyptic Curve cryptography is probably backdoored. Well, I am also like that, I can sense danger extremely well. zkSNARKS are dangerous. Stay away.
I know they are back door this is why I laughed when you said this shit
what's the difference?
RingCT seems to be the superior if I am not mistaken right?
"SNARKs and STARKs are zero-knowledge proof technologies that allow one party to prove to another that a statement is true without revealing any further information. Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) have been garnering a lot of attention across an array of use cases for their transformative potential for enhancing security, protecting user privacy, and supporting scaling with layer-2 networks. ZKPs enable one party to prove to another party that a statement is true without revealing any additional information. ZKPs are both beneficial for increasing privacy—since they reduce the amount of information shared between parties—and scalability, since they allow proofs to be verified at a faster rate than if the entire data set would have to be verified. Two prominent zero-knowledge proof systems are SNARKs and STARKs. In this article, we’ll dive into what they are, how they work, and their key differences."
Обсуждают сегодня