After having done the 108g RAM blocking event through RamsDao

Question

After having done the 108g RAM blocking event through RamsDao

(eos labs project) A member of the team that runs the network, posted in an exclusive group that on that date it was possible to view via relay, "many won't like it, but we no longer need buy more Ram", this already sounds malicious. But moving forward, those who could (many had their RAM blocked and are now faced with sudden changes) there was a rush to sell, causing the price to drop by more than 50%. During the following weeks, the community's doubts were answered without clarity, mentioning that it was because users were taking advantage of purchases made by the Wram Fund and that the RAM acquisitions already made were at a financial loss (they are network funds, not from a corporation to make profits), sounds malicious again. almost a month later, something about it was officially published, with a prepared and vague text so that it would not be possible to make accusations, and they would be able to maneuver public opinion. In previous official publications it is visible that the 35M would be used to acquire RAM in a short period after the new tokenomics change, even saying that it should be done, until the release of spring 1.0, is this information still valid? Why was there no immediate transparency and clarity on the goals and future plans for the network?

#blockchain #cryptocurrency #english #eos

0

13.08.2024