course he is entitled to his opinion, but he is pretty much saying that the Nervos state rent system has been a failed 'experiment'.
I know he has an obvious need to always sound like the smartest guy in the room, but as one of Nervos' founders this post is totally out of line IMO.
Sometime's you just need to know when to keep your mouth shut (and dont worry, I understand that I should probably be living by that rule here myself).
https://x.com/knwang/status/1832936987411497158?t=NVmPgdIGo10ikq9v4IaBDA&s=19
See if you are eligible https://fapy.xyz/
Not unpopular, that’s a dagger in the town square
I’m not sure how you arrived at that conclusion. Nervos eco model was very much inline with the OP’s point and obviously a potential solution for the point he raised. Solutions for “Economic Sustainability” can only be evaluated with time, but what we have is at least theoretical sound, while others have fundamental theoretical challenges. The proof of useful work solution doesn’t exist today, but if it were to exist, it could be a very interesting solution along be same line of being sustainable, and it should definitely be evaluated
in terms of the proving as consensus, you just have to solve for leader rotation?
"Been saying this since ‘19 and experimented with alternative crypto-economic schemes around state rent, where people do pay (via inflation) by occupying state (holding assets). But I think the solution may actually need to come from the supply side" That's what you wrote, it's very clear to me. Anyone reading this who didn't know you were talking about CKB would think this 'experiment' never even got off the ground. But anyway, I think there's some of us who would appreciate you looking like you're actually proud of CKB and not embarrassed to mention it's name. That was a great opportunity for you to talk about CKBs model and then put forward your other ideas.
To know more about the supply & issuance of $CKB 👉👉 linktr.ee/ckbtokenomics
Обсуждают сегодня