the initial roadmap. Only that BCH, since we left, has no roadmap and all they built is hobby dev level stuff. They have not developed anything on the infrastructure level besides cashtoken and abla. both these upgrades are not as big as you think. We have even video interviews explaining why a dynamic block size increase is the thing you implement last, not first. A dynamic blocksize increase is like increasing the speed limit. if your car can't drive faster, increasing the speed limit doesn't help. in fact, it may be problematic and lead to crashes I the car or the infrastructure is not capable of handling these speeds. therefore you optimize the network (as explained in our http://e.cash/roadmap) and then you introduce the dynamic block size increase. This was always part of the roadmap. BCH skipped the optimization and simply did the dynamic block size but it did not make the chain more scalable. just increased capacity that it at least at this point cannot handle... why increase capacity if the network cant handle it? it is bad engineering.
I was asking why ecash forked and community replying
the first part is a complete lie. Of course the IFP is a divergence from the roadmap.
Reading eCash roadmap is very good if you want your brain to rot. Once somebody leaves the path of honest money and try to scam the community he will make whatever explanations possible to justify it. Not everything you read on the Internet is true.
IFP is their DEV tax. 30% of block rewards go to Aumary. it was supposed to go to some holding council thing. I have no idea if there is a system in place for distribution of funds.
Стикер
Обсуждают сегодня