No. We have an automatic blocksize now.
BCH has flexible blocksizes, it can handle 64MB already Up to 256MB has been tested
Is the blocks space utilized? Or if the Blocksize is dynamic what is the current Blocksize?
Blocks fill as they need to. Largest so far on chain has been just over 32mb I think. But obviously it goes up and down with use. Smallest is still some kb.
This was a self test of the chain though, wasn't it?
Is there a BCH Blockexplorer?
A couple people sort of already explained, but to elaborate a bit, there is no wasted space in BCH blocks, the actual blocks are the size of the transactions they contain plus headers. This is probaly true for every chain in existence (unless you want to call stored data or transactions wasted space), as empty space isn’t explicitly stored. “Block size” is typeically used to describe the maximum allowed block size. For BCH, this is dynamic with a lower limit of 32 MB for the max. For BCH to get to 64 MB blocks using our dynamic blocksize, if I remember correctly, it would take at least 2 years, and it would take longer than that unless all blocks were at least 80% full or something like that. Meanwhile, when the mempool gets to 32MB+, the next block could be empty, 1MB, 4MB, 8MB, 16MB, 32MB, or any other size in between depending on what the miner who finds the block chose to do.
Currently active BCH specific ones include: https://explorer.melroy.org/ https://explorer.bitcoinunlimited.info/ https://bchblockexplorer.com/ Multichain explorers that also explore BCH include: https://3xpl.com/ https://blockchair.com/
Not a self test. It was a company in Australia testing their channel tech.
32MB is a floor even if blocks are underutilized, algo won't start moving meaningfully unless we can sustain like 50% fullness
Of course 32MB is the floor of the maximum. Not the smallest block.
explorer.melroy.org
Обсуждают сегодня