If there is excess would it not make sense to

Question

Constellation Network

Ronin Admin

If there is excess would it not make sense to

run several nodes rather than stake more than is minimally required to run a node?

#blockchain #constellation #cryptocurrency #english

0

23.09.2021

8 ответов

13 просмотров

Ronin Admin Автор вопроса

So it would be better to say for example run 20 nodes than running only one with a lot of DAG?

0

23.09.2021

Reservoir Dag$

I believe this to be the case.. the overriding factors that will affect PRO score (which determines rewards) would be uptime and age of node.. better to just run more nodes that stack it in one

0

23.09.2021

Slippy

i imagine most with n x 250k DAG will opt to run n nodes. but the tokenomics paper has a section in it that describes an advantage to having >250k DAG in a single node - i don't remember it in great detail, but i believe it results in increased throughput (and so increased rewards), among other things

0

23.09.2021

Ronin Admin Автор вопроса

Thank you for the clarity.

0

23.09.2021

Ronin Admin Автор вопроса

Interesting insight, I’ll look for that for more clarity.

0

23.09.2021

Reservoir Dag$

It's unclear if this is referring to a State Channel running its own nodes, whereby, if they needed it, they could increase their feeless throughput allowance by staking more $DAG in the wallet... in this case, rewards wouldn't apply.. It's also been suggested that not all nodes could benefit from higher staking amounts, but some of them could depending on age and PRO score...

0

23.09.2021

Slippy

yeah this is a good point, it's not as clear as it could be

0

23.09.2021

Reservoir Dag$ · Accepted Answer

Reservoir Dag$

yes, you can run several

0

23.09.2021

210 похожих чатов

If there is excess would it not make sense to

8 ответов

Похожие вопросы