May i ask what problem is did you mean hash block ?
which need to be solved so the individual
>> individual chain ?
hashing power is 1/10 of total. Which in my view makes it 10 times easier to do malicious stuff. >> I think mechanism design to add more chain as needed so thats hash power should never down to 1/10
add more chain will happened when TX is too much and gas fee increaseed too much. For me i think this level mean only single chain cannot handle tx by that time so we add more chain to reduce workload of the existing. Lets say it never so low like that.
Chains are braided. They have to stay together within a few blocks
But can't the winning miner on one chain decide which transaction get into next block? If so you can still remain in consensus with other chains.
You cant force a block producer to include a transaction indeed. Like every other decentralized networks
So then miner can in theory halt that transactions at a cheaper cost then on single chain. That's all I'm saying, maybe not that big of a deal.
Well I can't find the attack vector anymore that I thought was there. Do the miners work on all chains or is it a subset?
More incentive to mine all of them at the moment
Обсуждают сегодня