You see where I’m getting at right? There is absolutely

Question

BSV Enterprise Utility Blockchain (BEUB)

You see where I’m getting at right? There is absolutely

no way someone can prove a person is not an anon unless they were the anon themselves to disprove or if the person defending was the anon and had evidence to support it

#beub #blockchain #cryptocurrency #english

0

09.10.2021

6 ответов

22 просмотра

paintedfrog

You are mixing “proof” and “evidence” now

0

09.10.2021

Saiyan Автор вопроса

paintedfrog
You are mixing “proof” and “evidence” now

You know where I’m getting at, strong evidence to prove he is nakamoto Or strong evidence to prove he is not Evidence of , “I don’t like him because he is a liar on other things so he must also be lying about satoshi” isn’t strong evidence on that topic Nor is Craig handing a bunch of backdated documents But a key signing would be strong evidence, or Atleast verified bank statements that have been carefully audited tying him to anything nakamoto used

0

09.10.2021

paintedfrog

Saiyan
You know where I’m getting at, strong evidence to ...

Then put aside the long and detailed history of lying, impersonating, forging, and plagiarism. He is demonstrably incompetent in code, particularly Script which Satoshi invented. His own examples prove this fact. He didn’t know what a double was in 2014. Bitcoin is written in C++. Are you saying this is *not* evidence against?

0

10.10.2021

Saiyan Автор вопроса

paintedfrog
Then put aside the long and detailed history of ly...

this is emotion taking over once again 1. Sadly yes, even tho it shows character that is not what’s up for discussion, it’s whether he is satoshi or not 2. There is no evidence satoshi was one person He also claimed their were 3 people Not saying these two things correlate exactly but Steve could not code like woz but he was the visionary to push it further. My point for that statement is there is no proof of the defined roles within nakamoto. Csw even said his code was absolute shit so that’s hard to use against him on that point Neutrality until undeniable proof is administered on either side kind sir You are more than welcome to have opinions but facts are ongoing

0

10.10.2021

paintedfrog

Saiyan
this is emotion taking over once again 1. Sadly ...

Wrt emotion you are imagining things. Again, excusemaking is not evidence. *Satoshi* never said he was multiple people and there is very little indication that he wasn’t just one guy.

0

10.10.2021

Martin · Accepted Answer

Martin

This was my point

0

09.10.2021

210 похожих чатов

You see where I’m getting at right? There is absolutely

6 ответов

Похожие вопросы