suffer a 51% attack then what is stopping a much smaller POW network such as KDA from the same fate?
Sort of. More chains = faster confirmation time/harder to do a double-spend attack. KDA uses the Blake2s hash algo for mining, and we're more or less the only ones that do to the point that almost ever ASIC that mines in blake2s only works with KDA. This makes a 51% much harder to do vs BSV as BSV isnt the only chain to have ASICs that can mine it. Bitcoin Cash etc all use sha256, so a 51% against them just needs a few % of BTC miners with sha256 asics to dedice to do a 51% attack.
https://medium.com/gauntlet-networks/analysis-of-kadenas-public-blockchain-protocol-31c66347e32e
1.2 exahash is small. so small
Smaller than BSV which got 51%?
Обсуждают сегодня