only receiving them as they vest, then what is the problem? Is it that the network thinks they are owed some of that 45m eos from b1?
The issue is b1 selling tokens they don’t yet own
And freeing themselves from the commitment attached to those tokens becoming available to them in the first place
So let Brock take that risk. Otherwise I’m not sure why this matters to the network
Because we all funded b1 having those tokens so they would grow the network
You don’t get unvested shares when you leave early at a company, not how it works. Vesting is non transferable.
What about future property interests?
See that is where the narrative breaks down. The narrative was that B1 would put $1b into the network. It was never explicitly supposed to be funded by their eos holdings. You’re trying to hold an on chain asset hostage because of an off chain ‘promise’
Because it 8ncludes the responsibility of $10-15m annual dev costs to maintain the code that not just EOS is relying on
Enf has explicitly said they are taking this over. I’m sure Helios and Eden will help out here
Обсуждают сегодня