Absolutely not.
Why it is so?
It's not secure and is a nightmare to develop on. Yes, that means dapps for Kadena can't be copy / pasted from EVM code, but you should see that as a positive, not a negative.
But it will affect the adoption, there are hundreds of dapps in evm, how easily they can migrate to kadena?
Developers are getting attracted to Pact and Kadena, I would not be worried ecosystem seems to be growing nicely
Is pact the only language we support compile in? What about rust, go, c and c++?
Only Pact as it's TaylorMade for blockchain dapps with formal verification embedded
How many dapps we have now approx? How many we are aiming in next 1-2 years?
https://builtonkadena.info/
See this to get hindsight of why Pact was born: https://twitter.com/SirLensALot/status/1374077964648919043?t=qEG8_9qXq6w8vDjYmsz31A&s=19
Languages come and go if we see them from 10-20 years range. That's why we should have the capability to support multiple languages
You can agreed or not on the reasons behind Pact I do agree for instance
Let's agree to disagree on this
Обсуждают сегодня