210 похожих чатов

Doesn'T turning off the masternodes just allow the remaining ones

greater power to manipulate the blockchain? Wouldn't it be better to make the current masternodes all vote for the next block to contain no transactions instead?

1 ответов

12 просмотров

I believe such situation is not subject to vote, as per announcement, is a possible exploit found in the atomic swap. In such case, I believe the approach taken was the safest and fastest to protect users and funds obviously. Surelly will be users that will be upset for not being able to trade. We prefer the protection of the overall community. Its simple as that.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта