providing the service of collateralizing BTC (and other coins), they also must provide some security and basic checks to make sure minted dBTC ~= BTC in collateral. That was laughably easy to detect (in hindsight for me, but should have been obvious foresight for them). A script that says "How much is minted vs how much is in the current BTC pool?" is enough.
Put another way, and this *IS* ficticious.. If there was a rogue employee at Cake that minted dBTC, what checks do they have? They are a blackbox, but the simple script above (is minted dBTC > collateral?) would catch that case and infinite others.
I agree with you. Maybe a 50-50 responsibility would be nice. Like 50% community funds and 50% cake funds to solve the problem.
Обсуждают сегодня