us to pay more money ?
Yep. You don’t get out of bankruptcy by giving valuable product away for free.
valuable product meaning token symbol ?
It’s completely voluntary, but you are seeking to create a standard of what’s official and what’s not and charging for the privilege when it should be a public good, should it not? With this comment it seems you are just looking for ways to charge developers extra, but you are biting the hand that feeds you. Why are you seeking to raise the barrier to entry for developers when developers are a scarce resource themselves? EOS needs developers. The more developers, the more the chain is used, the more the chain is used, the higher the price, more in the treasury, etc. Why did you design EOS to not have txn fees? It makes it attractive to developers. It’s the freemium model. Gather value on the backend, not the frontend, right? You are going against your own principles here. Dispute resolution solves everything without charging developers on the frontend, retaining EOS’ attractiveness to devs.
In projects usually not only devs are involved. Marketers, ceos, managers etc. Why just speaking about devs?
I was talking about modern blockchain projects that may want to switch to EOS, since most projects are lead or heavily influenced by developers today, but you’re right that in the future this won’t be the case.
Обсуждают сегодня