Isn'T TODA protocol proprietary? Which would make anything utilizing/incorporating it

Question

SingularityNET Community

Shaun M

Isn'T TODA protocol proprietary? Which would make anything utilizing/incorporating it

non decentralized?

#cryptocurrency #english #singularitynet

0

04.02.2022

4 ответов

31 просмотр

Jeff

Mac Foraday (If I'm DMing you, I am a scammer)
That will be addressed in the future. Can't say an...

That is not a really a fair response. If what he is saying is true people have a right to know now. Alot of people here are investing In decentralized ai. If I want my money to go the other way u would of put it somewhere else. So that is a very valid.question that requires a better answer then soooon

0

04.02.2022

ben goertzel

The TODA protocol is not proprietary. There are two pieces -- there is TODA/IP which is described in the 2019 (messy, drafty but technically solid) whitepaper linked from the Hypercycle WP. Then there are the TODA consensus mechanisms, which are numerous ... some are publicly discussed in online TODA documentation and some are being kept quiet at the moment by TODA Network. For Hypercycle we will vary on the standard TODA consensus mechanisms anyway, e.g. incorporating Proof of Reputation along with some traditional TODA methods. All this is based on the Toda Tree data structures, which are described in Dann's paper on Proof of Provenance that's on the TODAQ website (also linked from Hypercycle WP). In short, while some TODA stuff invented by Toufi and Dann is being kept quiet by them, we don't critically need those parts for HyperCycle, we just need the parts that have been publicly disclosed already and then we will add unique HyperCycle stuff on top of that. Some of the TODA stuff currently kept quiet may also end up being publicly disclosed in the HyperCycle context, but we don't critically require this. All HyperCycle code will be OSS. We probably won't re-use code from prior TODA implementations (though if a chance emerges to, great!), but will implement new code based on the TODA math and data structures and algos etc. This is not for IP reasons mainly, but because we want most of this stuff in Haskell for optimal Cardano integration and current TODA implementations (which are numerous) are not in Haskell.

0

08.02.2022

Shaun M Автор вопроса

ben goertzel
The TODA protocol is not proprietary. There are t...

Thank you for this clarification! Good to hear not moving away from OS

0

09.02.2022

Mac Foraday (If I'm DMing you, I am a scammer) · Accepted Answer

Mac Foraday (If I'm DMing you, I am a scammer)

That will be addressed in the future. Can't say any more than that right now

0

04.02.2022

209 похожих чатов

Isn'T TODA protocol proprietary? Which would make anything utilizing/incorporating it

4 ответов

Похожие вопросы