We have Statechannels.. if it’s going to be constraint, the party wanting the data should pay more for speed/bandwidth. This won’t effect other Statechannels.
read this
This is a good read. https://t.me/share/url?url=https://cointelegraph.com/explained/what-is-a-directed-acyclic-graph-in-cryptocurrency-how-does-dag-work/amp&text=What%20is%20a%20directed%20acyclic%20graph%20in%20cryptocurrency?%20How%20does%20DAG%20work?
Can you link this
Did everyone just skip over this?
What do you mean? We read the silly stuff.
Does he not make a valid point?
I don't think most people have the technical expertise to answer such a question. @SethVi might.
He is comparing centralized vs decentralized solutions. It is well known that a centralized database is faster then a DLT solution - but that is kinda a moot point because we are talking about decentralized networks and not SQL databases.
sounds like a critique of single-tiered, single partition DAGs...which constellation is not
Sorry for being Ignorant in your work but have you written anything about Amdahls law and constellation?
I have not but I am familiar with it. Basically it comes down to whatever part of the computation is not parallelizable will ultimately be the bottleneck
Обсуждают сегодня