210 похожих чатов

Not fud, but can someone show me the other side

of this argument??

12 ответов

13 просмотров

We have Statechannels.. if it’s going to be constraint, the party wanting the data should pay more for speed/bandwidth. This won’t effect other Statechannels.

read this

This is a good read. https://t.me/share/url?url=https://cointelegraph.com/explained/what-is-a-directed-acyclic-graph-in-cryptocurrency-how-does-dag-work/amp&text=What%20is%20a%20directed%20acyclic%20graph%20in%20cryptocurrency?%20How%20does%20DAG%20work?

Can you link this

Did everyone just skip over this?

Johnny
Does he not make a valid point?

I don't think most people have the technical expertise to answer such a question. @SethVi might.

He is comparing centralized vs decentralized solutions. It is well known that a centralized database is faster then a DLT solution - but that is kinda a moot point because we are talking about decentralized networks and not SQL databases.

sounds like a critique of single-tiered, single partition DAGs...which constellation is not

SethV
sounds like a critique of single-tiered, single pa...

Sorry for being Ignorant in your work but have you written anything about Amdahls law and constellation?

Johnny
Sorry for being Ignorant in your work but have you...

I have not but I am familiar with it. Basically it comes down to whatever part of the computation is not parallelizable will ultimately be the bottleneck

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта