working with has a history of draining defendants funds on cases that have no chacne of success?
Hi 😄 how do you think about our potential bet by now?
I think I am going to win this bet quite easily...
https://twitter.com/bytemaster7/status/1498735562395693065?s=20&t=7TfcvmKppWQzXw9279MrRw Do you know what this means for the lawsuit? I dont really get the post.
All that means is that Dan will not be sued by the ENF in this litigation.
This doesn't prevent Dan from being sued for other matters by the ENF, nor does it prevent Dan from being sued by other individuals who are not the ENF brining forward similar cases. Important caveat: anyone can sue anyone. But suing someone does not mean you have a case
Hopefully we will find out soon then 🤞
One of the reasons I'm pressing for more details is to understand the costs involved.
If it's one of those deals where they don't get paid unless their client gets paid, would you be in favor of it?
what happens if the client loses? Who's responsible for legal fees then. Often times the plantiff will be liable to pay the other sides legal fees too
I think lawyers working on those deals eat the cost because nobody forces them to take the case
Just let it go, ENF are pursuing this with or without your backing
Do you need any help with reading comprehension?
Do you need help in taking in what I said
Обсуждают сегодня