your response that you failed to?
Nah you just ignored this whole comment I made Like I said before, the global consensus only know the one state provided by that state channel nodes each snapshot. There could be hundreds of thousands of transactions that happen within the state channel that don't manifest on the global consensus other than the state Channel nodes saying "hey all these transactions happened since last snap shot" If all the nodes in agreement from the state channel are from the same entity, they could be agreeing on false transactions, and we have a byzantine attack.
And if there is a Byzantine attack the nodes involved are detected by the rest of the network are they not? And their Pro score drops and they are left out of future transactions? Isn't that the whole idea?
Обсуждают сегодня