210 похожих чатов

MakerDAO is providing 175% coll. ratio for 0.75% interest p.a. DefiChain

needs 500% coll. ratio to get to 1% interest p.a.

Maybe it's time to discuss those rates to attract more inflow of BTC to the ecosystem...
And is it possible, that other operators will join the defichain system to wrap BTC and mint dBTC for greater capital flow? Right now only CakeDefi has the right to do that minting.

Like wBTC and renBTC which are open protocolls to wrap BTC. That would allow more CEX trading of dBTC which would enable us to establish a dBTC/BTC liquidity pool.

3 ответов

13 просмотров

Hi! Not exactly, there is no "right" to wrap tokens. Cake does that now in exclusive, but that is not by right, it's just because no one as decided to do that also. Defichain code is opensource, anyone can grab that and study it to make it's own Defichain ecosystem compatible wraping. But is no essy task. As for the rates, that us open for discussion, abyone xan ipen a thread on reddit to discuss them and submit a proposal to change them 🙂

Gaara- Автор вопроса
DanieL BaptistA
Hi! Not exactly, there is no "right" to wrap token...

Thats not correct. dBTC is a token created by one entity in the ecosystem. No other player can mint the same token. It's only useful, if 1 dBTC is always 1BTC. I could create dBTC2 Token and provide bridging but that would be 1 side and dBTC the second wrapped BTC....

Gaara
Thats not correct. dBTC is a token created by one ...

But that is what I said. No one is stopping anyone from creating a bridge and create a customized token. As long as it is according the rules. You can perfectly create your own dBTC2. It is perfectly possible. The real "problem", is not to create a wrapped token (which is not easy) , is to act as custodian. It would not be an individual thst could bear to do such, would always need to be some sort of entity. You can propose an improvement proposal fir a new atomic swap for example and develop it by yourself of with your team for example. If masternodes vote it favourably, it can be done. As for the previous iteraction of the atomic swap, since there was no custodian, yes that always needed to be a 1:1 user activity, because for every buyer, there was the need to have a buyer, there was no pool. That is another point that can be subject to a future improvement.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

For all those that keep asking why no pump? why this ? and why that...? Please close ur ewt chart and open 2 others - TOTAL (total mc) and BTC.D (btc dominance). Maybe BTC a...
Inn3r_G
19
"Since pnut can flip FTM easily, I'm swapping my FTM to pnut and hoping for a easy x5-x10" Perfect recipe for disaster. NFA but chances are, you'll end up as exit liquidity ...
C. A.
7
AMD status update? No longer in the plan but something might be around the corner later on Chinese partner? No longer in the plan. This market does not seem to be the top ...
Ben
6
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
@marycamacho @NATHANLENAE @popachubby It was said that HOT will be used for hosting payments. But HOT is ERC20 based. So slow and high paying. The ERC network does not seem ve...
Aragorn
17
[kilv3r] Hey everyone! You probably saw the AMA today, and are aware that CyberVerse has made it into the finalists list to be integrated on Ronin blockchain, that would be th...
DiscordBridge
3
Welcome Mary Clark to the Pirate Chain chat Matey ☠️ PIRATE CHAIN is a cryptocurrency for private anonymous transactions. Official website https://piratechain.com ⚠️ Beware...
Rose
1
Another way to think about it is like this: let's say we sell $100m of FXB2029 and another $100m of FXB2055 and we buy $200m of ETH with it. Do you think that ETH price will b...
Sam Kazemian ¤⛓️¤
20
Is alice project is only a game or studio as well?
Hana
15
Bitcoin will probably halt around here somewhere to let alts push a bit?
Neo Smitty
16
Карта сайта