210 похожих чатов

MakerDAO is providing 175% coll. ratio for 0.75% interest p.a. DefiChain

needs 500% coll. ratio to get to 1% interest p.a.

Maybe it's time to discuss those rates to attract more inflow of BTC to the ecosystem...
And is it possible, that other operators will join the defichain system to wrap BTC and mint dBTC for greater capital flow? Right now only CakeDefi has the right to do that minting.

Like wBTC and renBTC which are open protocolls to wrap BTC. That would allow more CEX trading of dBTC which would enable us to establish a dBTC/BTC liquidity pool.

3 ответов

14 просмотров

Hi! Not exactly, there is no "right" to wrap tokens. Cake does that now in exclusive, but that is not by right, it's just because no one as decided to do that also. Defichain code is opensource, anyone can grab that and study it to make it's own Defichain ecosystem compatible wraping. But is no essy task. As for the rates, that us open for discussion, abyone xan ipen a thread on reddit to discuss them and submit a proposal to change them 🙂

Gaara- Автор вопроса
DanieL BaptistA
Hi! Not exactly, there is no "right" to wrap token...

Thats not correct. dBTC is a token created by one entity in the ecosystem. No other player can mint the same token. It's only useful, if 1 dBTC is always 1BTC. I could create dBTC2 Token and provide bridging but that would be 1 side and dBTC the second wrapped BTC....

Gaara
Thats not correct. dBTC is a token created by one ...

But that is what I said. No one is stopping anyone from creating a bridge and create a customized token. As long as it is according the rules. You can perfectly create your own dBTC2. It is perfectly possible. The real "problem", is not to create a wrapped token (which is not easy) , is to act as custodian. It would not be an individual thst could bear to do such, would always need to be some sort of entity. You can propose an improvement proposal fir a new atomic swap for example and develop it by yourself of with your team for example. If masternodes vote it favourably, it can be done. As for the previous iteraction of the atomic swap, since there was no custodian, yes that always needed to be a 1:1 user activity, because for every buyer, there was the need to have a buyer, there was no pool. That is another point that can be subject to a future improvement.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта