I as a member and holder of eos want to

propose Dan's ban. Every time he writes he changes the cards. But have you seen what he wrote a little while ago? He wanted more money from ENF without a road map, because he thinks himself a king. he blackmailed enf and eos to leave eos (which he later did) if we sued b1 . After eos he respectively said he wanted to launch: decentralized twitter (he also said he would no longer tweet, another lie), eden, clarion, fractally, new blockchan database and who knows next week what else.

I agree to ban Dan as he is blocking us on other places and also he has nothing to do here any more

this is the reason why eos has a hard time gaining new community because of all the haters

There are many more important reasons. I hope ENF can do something for us

a successful platform is build on positive community sentiment plus being supportive of our devs...look at ETH with clunky tech and they were able to grow a much bigger community than eos

We were supportive before but can't be anymore, they just see their pocket

if you don't want to support it move on but it does worse to a community by elevating the hate specially to others 🥴

I only ban people talking about off topic things and harrassing our community which is trying to do productive things. I come here because I care about EOS and hope that the EOS community will resume the path toward decentralization.

We've opened up EOSIO development over the past year so that anyone can contribute and expand upon it instead of a small select group. We've seen this unite what was previously four predominantly fractured communities towards an ever greater open, transparent, and decentralized future. Fractally discussion is not only allowed, it is encouraged, here and in every other EOS related communication channel run by the EOS community. It's condescending comments like "resume the path towards decentralization" that fan the flames of division.

Bro, you are right. No offense, Dan could have been a legend like vitalik. But now Dan will only bring more chaos.

I guess no one could have said it better.

We haven't stopped moving towards decentralization...but you're always welcome to come here and share and contribute with your views which are valued by most. Just be prepared to engage with those who have meaningful push back and want to discuss your ideas in good faith.

Speaking of Fractally bans, just noticed I am also banned... 🤔 Barely even speak in that group Does expressing 👎 message reactions contribute to getting banned?

Some action is always needed in focus groups, but public forums should remain open to all views, even the ramblings of a madman should be heard by all to ignore or participate in.

I was banned too, but I also called Dan and autist and such, amongst other things if I recall correctly

I don't think divisions should exist in a decentralized platform, the reasons why centralization comes up in discussions is because there are components of centralization and we need a better understanding on how to decentralized those systems 😁

You care about eos?? Ahahhaahhahaahaah DAN 4.1 bn ICO EOS IS BELOW 1bn cap Please stop stop stop

Why? Now we have quite centralized enf, whats good to catch up. But later i wish a more decentralized allocation of community capital.

i think down the road .. we can have eden form an additional network foundation team.

enf is a private org which has got BPs and network trust.

Division = decentralization

A platform becomes more decentralized as more leaders work together rather than a few making decisions

only thing is that enf has the most relevant name. 🙂

I’m banned too

I’m banned too

I’m banned too

There is a difference between condescending and well informed. I am concerned that if compromise is not an option "we" miss an opportunity to work together to build computer networking systems that could have solved the risk/issue of future proof. I am neither condescending, well informed (in this instance), or taking sides. But, I am familiar with overreaching and lost opportunities.