for the dynamic dex fee to come down while also maintaining a premium on dusd?
Yes, currently we’re not sure how much real demand there is on DUSD. The goal is that DUSD doesn’t go too far down such as $0.8x or too high like $1.1x.
I kind of warned about this though. Constant lever pulling will simply result in unexpected outcomes and volatile swings in one direction or the other. Complexity = more potential points of failure and is a risk vector.
This should have been foreseen by the devs before implementation, that this fee would cause this. But I think the uncertain part is, can we get the fee down? And that’s the hardest part of this
Agree, I think nobody understands anymore what drives the DUSD price. Last jump from 0.78 to 1 is probably not due to the new rules, while inflation from 1 to 1.11 is ...
Increasingly longer list of weights and counterweights. It’s confusing and probably unnecessary. Again, I love the project but this is a key weakness as I see it.
Could be but the process is as transparent as possible. You erie a proposal, masternodes vote and devs implement. Anything outside that process does not change or improve the ecosystem so even if you manage to get supporrt from people here or on reddit, unless you make a proposal for masternodes to vote ot is pretty pointless to endlessly go around with it. The project jjust does not operate like that
Обсуждают сегодня