210 похожих чатов

I remember some discussion about 3 nodes per state channel

minimum, so if we divide current soft nodes (~5600) by 3, does that mean we could have 1833 state channels at minimum of 3 nodes per SC?

4 ответов

28 просмотров

We also will have Lite Nodes. Which could be utilized by State Channels that may not need as much txs or they aren't worried about the speed as much. 😉 Also... The limit of the amount of nodes could be changed in the future by governance if it were ever needed. An example of how they could scale the network further would be similar to a stock split. Basically doubling the amount of dag that holders own. Which would more than double the amount of nodes. 😉 But remember... That if the network ever got into a position to do this. All of us would probably be very happy campers... Because that would mean HGTP is very successful.

Shadows
Or decrease the node collateral amount. Seems simp...

IF, and I mean IF this was ever an option, it most likely wouldn't occur for many years. I doubt it's even on the radar for constellation at this moment in time. The goal of constellation right now is to maintain stability and security of the network while moving into mainnet 2.0. The process of onboarding all the nodes will take a while. I believe earlier in the chat, dagnum talked about why the mainnet 1.0 nodes will be first. I would imagine that the whole roll out process of the 2.0 network will most likely take over a year. I would spend more time stacking DAG for now, I highly doubt the 250k collateral will ever be changed any time soon

Shadows
Or decrease the node collateral amount. Seems simp...

Yes I suppose that could maybe a possibility if governance were to choose that route. But these are just hypothetical and simplified examples of what could be done. I'm sure whatever would be decided may be a little more complicated... But it's good to know that it wouldn't be very difficult if we find ourselves having to worry about this wonderful problem. 😉

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта