for EOS development or
EDEN is benefit for themselves???
Even if you do not have EOS, you can act as a member of Eden and you can also become a CD. The rest is up to you
So not benefit for EOS development
The judgment is yours.
For reference, Dan Larimer, who made EDEN, left and went to another place while making something else.
Yes. EDEN is no benefit for EOS development
Both. Eden has been and currently is a benefit to EOS (apart from recent controversies muddying the waters) but Eden must continue developing itself to be of greater benefit to EOS. Development of Eden is potentially of benefit for Eden members in that Eden can distribute funds to its members to provide improvements of the tools that it relies upon to operate more effectively, in service to EOS. There are developers within the Eden community, but any direct contributions to EOS code development, if that's what you are asking about, is purely tangential at this point. A working governance solution will be of GREAT benefit to EOS in the long run.
Then stopped halfway between that to do something else.
What else is Dan Larimer building after leaving EDEN midway? Oh, of course, EOS was also created in the middle and then left.
Every dApp running on EOS can make use of open source governance solutions if they are available. And the Hypha toolkit is being made available to EOS through a grant from the ENF.
I fully agree with you.
Обсуждают сегодня