The next milestone on the roadmap is indeed the support of Metagraphs on our Mainnet which is planned for this month. The next upcoming big milestones would be block prioritization/snapshot fees for Metagraphs, token/nft creation for Metagraphs, the ACI for interoperability and the PRO consensus mechanism in my eyes :)
Hopefully not that long anymore ;) It was mentioned that the protocol team is working on it!
I cannot get too exact over these! Sure it shows a step up the ladder and proves we are getting there. What I look forward too is some of these NDAs to appear and start using the network. That will in turn light the blue touch paper 🚀
Apart from DoD / federal, are there NDAs? 🤔
I think Ben referred to numerous ones, but I am happy to be corrected.
hey criptix, can you enumerate on exactly what constitutes "token and NFT creation" for metagraphs. Are you implying that is one in the same feature? also is there a dependency on the "executor"? does the executor exist both in the global L0 as well as a module within a metagraph? lastly, how does that relate to the implementation of the ACI in both the global network and metagraph networks?
Sorry, tough questions are not allowed!!! Ask Wyatt, he is in your league.
Look what I found 👀 https://github.com/Constellation-Labs/metagraph-examples/tree/development/marcus/PROT-365/adding-nft-example/examples/DataApi-NFT
That is up to the protocol team, no hard dates. Although some of this is part of this era ;)
@SethVi @SHS_Kurt Oh seems the team released the example code. Have fun creating your own NFT big bang 🥰
thanks criptix, does this mean the NFT is an L0 standardized data type?
No and yes. The team plans to go the same Route as Ethereum and will provide example codes for tokens, NFTs and more. The choosing of standards will be for the metagraphs and their devs to decide. The NFT example given is comparable to ERC721 so if most projects go with it in the future then we will have our NFT token standard ;) (That is how ERC20 tokens came to life, nowadays Ethereum has like three NFT standards --> ERC721, ERC1155 and ERC1155d)
ah, so it's more for the Metagraphs and not for the global L0 to process
It is explicitly not a standard. We're just creating an example implementation of a custom NFT type on a metagraph.
Обсуждают сегодня